In October 2013, the ACLU filed this friend-of-the-court brief in Commonwealth v. Gelfgatt, a case about encryption. The basic question that interested us was whether a defendant can be forced to decrypt their electronic files. Along with Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet & Society and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the ACLU said no: the right against self-incrimination protects defendants from being made to decrypt their own files. Because encryption scrambles data, encrypted data should be treated like a document that has been shredded. Even if the government can make a defendant turn over the shreds, it can’t make the defendant reassemble them.
Commonwealth v. Gelfgatt
Attorney(s)
Matthew Segal, Jessie Rossman (ACLU of Massachusetts); Nathan F. Wessler (ACLU); Kit Walsh (Berkman Center for Internet and Society); Hanni M. Fakhoury (Electronic Frontier Foundation)
Related Issues
Documents
Related content

ACLU files public records lawsuit against MA agencies for...
December 13, 2022
What you need to know about automatic license plate readers
December 12, 2022
ACLU of Massachusetts v. Executive Office of Public Safety and...
December 12, 2022
ACLU Urges U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Warrantless Pole...
November 18, 2022
Boston implements new surveillance oversight ordinance
October 31, 2022
ACLU of Massachusetts launches new podcast on technology and the...
September 12, 2022
Massachusetts House of Representatives advances face surveillance...
July 21, 2022