Reproductive Freedom

The ACLU is on the front lines – at the State House and in courtrooms – to safeguard the right to make the most fundamental decisions about our bodies, our families, and our lives.

A collage of images showing hands on a pregnant person's stomach, birth control pills, and the front of the Supreme Court.

In Massachusetts and nationwide, the ACLU fights laws and government policies preventing people’s access to contraception, abortion, and accurate information about sexual and reproductive health. This has included challenging government interference with the right to obtain reproductive health care including abortion and contraception, abstinence-only education in schools, mistreatment of pregnant people who are incarcerated, discrimination against pregnant workers, targeted regulations of abortion providers, and so-called religious refusals to comply with laws protecting the public.

Our attorneys have brought some of the major and historic challenges to abortion restrictions in Massachusetts, including Moe v. Secretary of Administration and Finance, which ensures a person’s right to reproductive freedom is a fundamental right under our state constitution.

In recent years, the ACLU of Massachusetts sued the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for permitting the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops to use taxpayer money to impose religiously based restrictions on abortion and contraceptive access for people in the federal program for trafficking victims. In 2016, we rallied for reproductive rights at the U.S. Supreme Court during a hearing on a landmark case that protected access to abortion.

We supported a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s discriminatory regulations authorizing schools and employers to opt out of providing contraception coverage to their employees and students based on religious or moral beliefs. Our view: we care about religious freedom, but religious freedom does not mean imposing religious views on others, especially where a constituional right like access to contraception is at stake.

In 2017, ACLU-backed legislation was signed into law, expanding access to affordable birth control in Massachusetts. Then in 2018, we helped pass bills to safeguard patient confidentiality for sensitive health care information and finally repeal archaic and unconstitutional anti-abortion laws.

In 2020, the state legislature passed the ROE Act, overriding Governor Charlie Baker's veto. We worked as a founding member of the the ROE Act Coalition to pass the new law, which represented a major step forward for abortion access at a time when this fundamental right was under threat around the country. The new law made Massachusetts the first state in the country to legislatively ease burdensome restrictions on young people’s access to care. It also enabled families to obtain care later in pregnancy in cases of lethal fetal diagnosis—without having to travel across the country.

However, barriers to reproductive freedom still abound, and the ACLU of Massachusetts will never stop working to remove those barriers. Following a leaked draft opinion from the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, the newly rebranded Beyond Roe Coalition—led by the ACLU of Massachusetts, Planned Parenthood Advocacy Fund of Massachusetts, and Reproductive Equity Now—launched a new advocacy agenda to protect and expand abortion access in Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Beyond Roe Agenda includes over a dozen recommendations for legislative action, budget investments, and regulatory solutions that state leaders can urgently take to expand abortion and other reproductive health care access; support Massachusetts providers and patients; and increase research and education efforts to help meet existing and growing health care needs.

The Latest

Resource
Placeholder image

Home

Press Release
fallback-case-lg.jpg

Supreme Court Issues Partial Stay in NIH Research Grants Case 

In a significant setback for public health, the U.S. Supreme Court today ruled that the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts likely lacked jurisdiction to review the termination of research grants by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) targeting research on disfavored topics...
Issue Areas: Reproductive Freedom
Resource
MA State House No Logo.png

Firewalls for Freedom

Here’s how Massachusetts leaders, at the executive, legislative, and local levels, can take action TODAY to build a firewall for freedom:
Press Release
Website Feature Image Location Bill.png

Reproductive advocacy groups applaud House effort to protect sensitive location data

Massachusetts elected officials must continue to fight with renewed urgency to ensure that we the people maintain control over our most private and personal information.
Issue Areas: Reproductive Freedom
Court Case
Dec 05, 2017

Massachusetts v. Hargan et. al

The Trump administration is allowing discrimination against people seeking reproductive health care.
Court Case
Sep 21, 2015

Moe v. Secretary of Administration and Finance

Protecting women's right to reproductive freedom under the state constitution.
Court Case
Jan 18, 2013

ACLU of Massachusetts v. Sebelius, et al.