All Cases


120 Court Cases
Court Case
Oct 28, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants’ Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Greater Boston Legal Services et al. v. Mullin

The federal government recently began hiding the locations of people being held in ICE detention. We are suing over this unlawful policy, which effectively disappears people in custody from their communities.
Court Case
Oct 23, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Government Transparency

ACLU of Massachusetts v. U.S. Department of Defense

We sued the U.S. Department of Defense for public records on military officers assigned to serve as temporary immigration judges. The apparent deployment of active-duty military personnel as judges with the power to deport and jail civilians raises serious constitutional questions.
Court Case
Oct 21, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants’ Rights

Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz et al.

This class action lawsuit challenges the ubiquitous denial of bond hearings to people detained by ICE across New England.
Court Case
Sep 15, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Voting Rights

League of Women Voters of Massachusetts v. Trump

This case challenges restrictions on mail ballots that are unconstitutional, unlawful, and likely to disenfranchise voters.
Court Case
Aug 20, 2026
Granite_Trust_Building_Quincy.jpg
  • Freedom of Religion and Belief

Fitzmaurice et al. v. City of Quincy

We filed this lawsuit in state court on behalf of Quincy residents who oppose the city’s installation of religious statues on the facade of a public safety building in violation of Massachusetts’ religious neutrality laws.
Court Case
Aug 17, 2026
Lilian Calderon and her husband Luis Gordillo
  • Immigrants’ Rights

Calderon v. Nielsen

We are challenging Trump’s attacks against married couples and families pursuing lawful immigration status.
Court Case
Aug 17, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Voting Rights

United States v. Galvin

In December 2025, the ACLU of Massachusetts and the ACLU Voting Rights Project filed a motion to intervene on behalf of Common Cause, Jane Doe Inc., and a Massachusetts voter in United States of America v. Galvin to prevent the U.S. Department of Justice from obtaining Massachusetts voters’ personal data. In July 2025, the DOJ asked Massachusetts to turn over voters’ full names, dates of birth, addresses, driver’s license numbers, and partial Social Security numbers — highly sensitive data protected under state and federal law. Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William F. Galvin appropriately declined to share this sensitive data. The United States then filed this lawsuit — one of at least twenty-five nearly identical actions the DOJ has initiated against states and election officials — seeking to compel the production of sensitive Massachusetts voter data. According to extensive public reporting, corroborated by government documents, the DOJ’s requests for private, sensitive voter data from Massachusetts and other states appear to be in connection with novel efforts to construct a national voter database, and to otherwise use untested forms of database analysis to scrutinize state voter rolls and challenge voters’ eligibility. In their motion to intervene, the parties argue that the DOJ’s request threatens voter privacy and could enable voter disenfranchisement. The parties’ motion to intervene was allowed on January 6, 2026. On behalf of the intervenors, the ACLU has since filed a motion to dismiss the DOJ’s complaint. The intervenors argue that the United States seeks to compel disclosure of sensitive voter information to which it is not entitled. Neither the information requests propounded by the DOJ, nor the complaint itself provide the “basis and the purpose” for the DOJ’s requests as required under the Civil Rights Act of 1960, under which the DOJ brings suit. The intervenors argue that the DOJ is grossly misusing civil rights era statutes to reach discriminatory and illegal ends. Additionally, the intervenors argue that the DOJ’s stated reason for requesting millions of Massachusetts voters’ personal data is pretextual. Public reporting and publicly available government documents confirm that the United States’s actual purpose is not to ensure compliance with federal statute, but to compile an unprecedented national voter file using error-prone forms of data-aggregation and then to use this tool to identify and mass-challenge ostensibly ineligible voters. Common Cause, an intervenor in the case, is a nonpartisan, grassroots organization dedicated to upholding the core values of American democracy. Jane Doe Inc. is a coalition of organizations dedicated to advocating on behalf of survivors of sexual and domestic violence. The group has an interest in protecting the privacy of survivors. Juan Pablo Jaramillo, a naturalized U.S. citizen, is also represented in the case. Jaramillo has an interest because his status as a naturalized citizen may place him at a heightened risk of being targeted for voter disenfranchisement, a threat that extends to countless other Massachusetts voters.
Court Case
Aug 14, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants’ Rights|
  • +1 Issue

ACLU of Massachusetts v. Plymouth County Sheriff’s Department

We are seeking public records on the Plymouth County Sheriff Department’s programs for providing medical care to civil immigration detainees. The request follows widespread reports of inadequate care provided to those held in ICE custody.
Court Case
Aug 14, 2026
Protest sign for transgender rights
  • LGBTQ Rights

Orr v. Trump

We filed a federal lawsuit challenging an Executive Order requiring all new passports to display an individual’s biological sex at birth.