Privacy and Surveillance

The ACLU works to expand the right to privacy, increase the control individuals have over their personal information, and ensure civil liberties are not compromised by technological innovation.

Image collage of a passport, surveillance cameras, and a person using a smartphone.

Founded in 2013, the ACLU of Massachusetts Technology for Liberty Program works to ensure that our laws keep pace with technology, and to protect our core civil liberties from the threats posed by novel forms of government and corporate surveillance.

While governments and corporations use novel technological methods to collect information and inform decisions about all of us, the harm is not borne equally by all members of our society. Like so many other issues, technology and civil rights violations tend to most negatively impact people of color, low-income people, religious minorities, and other marginalized populations. Our work, therefore, often focuses on issues at the intersection of technology and racial and gender justice.

In June 2023, the ACLU of Massachusetts and our partners launched a campaign to ban the sale and trade of cellphone location data, entitled Your Location: It’s None of Their Business. Every day, companies collect and sell sensitive location data from cellphones, revealing where people live, work, seek health care, and more. Since the overturning of Roe v. Wade, this practice puts patients seeking abortion care in Massachusetts at risk of prosecution and harassment, and threatens the privacy and safety of all people. Our campaign has one goal: to pass statewide legislation banning the sale and trade of cellphone location information.

Launched in 2019, our Press Pause on Face Surveillance campaign continues to build awareness about the civil liberties harms posed by this technology, and the need to bring its use by government under democratic control. To date, the campaign has won eight municipal bans on face surveillance technology in Massachusetts — including in the Commonwealth’s four largest cities — as well as state legislation. In 2022, a bipartisan legislative commission released a report recommending that lawmakers adopt further reforms on face surveillance. We are currently advocating for legislation to codify the commission’s recommendations.

We are helping cities and towns across the country to pass local ordinances that would prevent police from acquiring new surveillance technology in secret. Under these ordinances, all existing and future surveillance technology acquisitions are subject to public approval by elected officials. Several municipalities — most notably Boston in 2021 — have adopted these ordinances.

We also advocate for consumer privacy legislation, fighting to enact strong protections against the tracking, selling, and weaponization of our personal data by tech companies. We’re working to pass a bill, modelled on Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), that would offer Bay Staters the same level of protection against reckless and secretive exploitation of their personal data. We are also advocating for omnibus consumer privacy legislation, the Massachusetts Data Privacy Protection Act (MIPA), which if enacted would give Massachusetts residents the strongest digital privacy and civil rights protections in the world.

Through the Data for Justice Project, we are educating and empowering the public to advocate for government transparency and examining the racial and economic inequities that are found in every aspect of society. This project has conducted groundbreaking analyses of the Boston Police Department’s budget, state funding of prison construction, the disparate impact of COVID-19 on communities of color, the unequal distribution of broadband, the prevalence of government-owned drones in the skies above Massachusetts, and much more.

In September 2022, we launched a podcast, Freedom Unfinished, a four-part podcast that explores emerging technologies and the impact of artificial intelligence, big data, and biometric surveillance on civil liberties and democracy. Hosted by Executive Director Carol Rose and Technology for Liberty Director Kade Crockford, the show features interviews with experts, scholars, and advocates. Guests include U.S. Senator Ed Markey, Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist Julia Angwin, author and criminal justice expert Sandra Susan Smith, former dean of Harvard Law School and constitutional law expert Martha Minow, and many more.

Read more about the Technology for Liberty Program at our Privacy SOS blog.

The Latest

Press Release
lady-liberty-default-image.jpg

Labor, Reproductive Rights, Civil Liberties Advocates Applaud State Senate’s Passage of Data Privacy Legislation

The Massachusetts Senate today passed the Massachusetts Data Privacy Act (S.2608), which would provide strong, comprehensive protections for consumers and communities especially vulnerable to the abuse of sensitive personal data.
Resource
Placeholder image

Home

Press Release
Location Shield Act Hero Graphic Large Format.png

Advocates, experts call on lawmakers to ban sale of location data

At a time of rising extremism and reckless profiteering, digital privacy and online consumer protection has never been more important.
Press Release
MA State House No Logo.png

ACLU applauds new landmark data privacy legislation

Without regulation like the Massachusetts Data Privacy Act, companies are incentivized to collect and manipulate unlimited quantities of personal data about all of us.
Court Case
Dec 12, 2022

ACLU of Massachusetts v. Executive Office of Public Safety and Security et al.

The ACLU of Massachusetts, together with law firm Wolf Greenfield, filed a lawsuit against two Massachusetts agencies for failing to produce public records regarding the state’s use of automatic license plate reader (ALPR) technology.
Court Case
Sep 13, 2017

Merchant v. Mayorkas

Our clients were coerced into providing access to their devices even though they did nothing wrong.
Court Case
Aug 12, 2020

ACLU of Massachusetts v. City of Boston

The ACLU is suing the Boston Police Department for withholding public records.
Court Case
Oct 31, 2019

ACLU v. Department of Justice

The ACLU is seeking information on the FBI and DEA's use of face surveillance technology.