Economic Justice

The ACLU of Massachusetts works to ensure that all people have their basic rights protected regardless of their wealth or income.

Photo collage of Traci Griffith at a microphone, center image shows a protest sign with "Hands Off Our Workers", and left image shows hands on a steering wheel.

The ACLU of Massachusetts fights to protect some of society’s most economically vulnerable residents, including people experiencing homelessness and low-paid workers seeking equitable working conditions and living wages.

We successfully overturned panhandling bans in Worcester and Lowell, and defended the rights of a homeless man charged with trespassing in a building hallway after being unable to access emergency shelter on a cold winter night. In 2018, we filed a lawsuit challenging the state’s failure to follow laws requiring Massachusetts to promptly place eligible homeless families in shelters and use hotels when needed to accommodate homeless families with disability-related concerns.

The ACLU of Massachusetts also challenged the criminalization of poverty and won a case requiring judges to evaluate a defendant’s financial circumstances before determining how much they must pay in restitution.

In the legislature, we work to defend the civil rights and liberties of low-income families, pushing back on harmful policies like the cruel Massachusetts “cap on kids” that penalized poor children and their families simply because a child was conceived while the family was receiving government assistance.

We also fight for economic equality so that no one has to choose between a healthy family and keeping their job. In 2017, the ACLU-backed Pregnant Workers Fairness Act was signed into law, ensuring protections for pregnant women in the workplace. With the passage of paid family and medical leave, Massachusetts became a national leader in supporting working families and took a critical step towards economic equality for women and security for all hardworking Bay Staters.

The Latest

Press Release
Placeholder image

ACLU of Massachusetts Statement on Counsel Crisis Following Oral Arguments at Supreme Judicial Court

When the state fails to create a system where indigent defense attorneys can afford to do their work, the most vulnerable defendants pay the cost. The court must step in and exercise its authority to protect the constitutional right to counsel.
Press Release
ACLUM Responds to Supreme Court Decision in Grants Pass V. Johnson

ACLU of Massachusetts responds to Supreme Court decision in Grants Pass v. Johnson

Make no mistake: We cannot arrest our way out of homelessness. Instead, communities must prioritize proven solutions, like making housing more affordable and providing accessible and voluntary treatment.
Press Release
Boston City Hall

Statement of the ACLU of Massachusetts on new “Mass. and Cass” ordinance

Especially as Massachusetts faces an emergency family shelter crisis, policymakers at every level must do all they can to ensure our state’s most vulnerable people have access to safe shelter.
Press Release
MA State House No Logo.png

Statement of the ACLU of Massachusetts on 2024 state budget compromise

Massachusetts lawmakers announced a 2024 state budget compromise over the weekend, with a final proposal filed Sunday night and a vote scheduled for today. 
Issue Areas: Economic Justice
Court Case
Nov 05, 2021

Geddes v. City of Boston

The ACLU of Massachusetts and law firm WilmerHale filed a lawsuit to protect the constitutional rights and safety of people living unhoused in the area of Melnea Cass Boulevard and Massachusetts Avenue in Boston.
Court Case
May 02, 2018

Garcia et al v. Dept. of Housing and Community Development

The state should use hotels when needed to accommodate homeless families with disability-related concerns.
Court Case
Feb 05, 2016

Commonwealth v. Henry

An order requiring a criminal defendant to compensate the victim of her crime--a restitution order--must account for the defendant’s financial circumstances.
Court Case
Nov 25, 2015

Commonwealth v. Magadini

Does the "necessity defense" apply to homeless people who trespass to survive bitter cold?