Court Cases

We are asking the Supreme Judicial Court to affirm that in cases involving mitigating facts, such as Mr. Laltaprasad’s case, judges have both statutory and constitutional authorities to sentence below the minimum.

Gordon College punished tenured professor after she spoke out against the president's anti-LGBTQ discrimination.

An order requiring a criminal defendant to compensate the victim of her crime--a restitution order--must account for the defendant’s financial circumstances.

The ACLU brief argues that state ethics rules required prosecutors to seek court approval before secretly obtaining four years' worth of bank records for the defendant's attorney.

These defendants were convicted of assault and battery on the basis of diagnoses of Shaken Baby Syndrome--but since the mid-1980s, studies have been published that cast doubt on the theory that SBS can only result from shaking.

The Supreme Judicial Court unanimously affirmed that the government must have specific information that a cellphone contains evidence of a crime before it can search or seize the device.

Does the "necessity defense" apply to homeless people who trespass to survive bitter cold?

Victory! In a case involving cell site location information (CSLI), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held in September 2015 that the government must get a warrant for anything more than six hours of “telephone call” CSLI.