Painted figures at a protest

Action Report

Your Support Powers Every Victory

Stand with the ACLU of Massachusetts to protect freedom, equality, and justice in the year ahead.

Donate Now

Last updated on December 10, 2025

Defending Rights, Advancing Justice: Our 2025 Year in Review

In 2025, the ACLU of Massachusetts stood firm in protecting civil liberties and advancing equity for all. From the courts to the State House to communities across the Commonwealth, we challenged unjust laws, defended free expression, and pushed for a more fair and inclusive future.
Explore the stories, victories, and people that shaped this year’s fight for justice — and see how your support fuels change in Massachusetts and beyond.

Because of You, Justice Moves Forward

Every milestone in this report is a reflection of your commitment. Thanks to our supporters, partners, and volunteers, the ACLU of Massachusetts continues to meet the moment — defending civil rights, expanding access to justice, and protecting the freedoms that define our democracy.
As you explore the stories and successes from this past year, know that your advocacy and generosity make this work possible. Together, we’ve achieved lasting change — and with your continued support, we’re ready for the challenges ahead.

Meet the Match

An anonymous Massachusetts resident and ACLU supporter has offered a generous match, doubling all gifts made before the end of the year up to $50,000. In the face of unprecedented attacks on our democracy and our civil rights and civil liberties, this donor is choosing to fight back with their philanthropic advocacy. Together with you, they are choosing community.

Noor Zafar is a Senior Staff Attorney, Rachel Davidson, Staff Attorney, and Adriana Lafaille, Managing Attorney stand outside federal court in Burlington, Vermont

Immigrants' Rights

The ACLU of Massachusetts is at the forefront of defending immigrants’ rights. Since January, we have led key legal challenges to the Trump administration’s anti-immigrant agenda. That includes two major lawsuits defending birthright citizenship, and due process victories for a wide range of people who have been detained unlawfully by ICE. In the face of escalating threats, ACLU of Massachusetts advocates continue to advance groundbreaking immigrants’ rights litigation every day.

Rumeysa Ozturk Rally Sign reads "Free Rumeysa Ozturk"

Free Expression

In May, ACLU advocates secured freedom for Tufts PhD student Rümeysa Öztürk. She was picked up off the streets of Somerville and held in a Louisiana for-profit ICE prison for 45 days — in retaliation for writing an op-ed for her student newspaper. This is an affront to free expression, and we are proud to represent Ms. Öztürk in her ongoing federal case. ACLU advocates also successfully challenged the federal government’s censorship of medical research papers for including references to transgender patients.

Protestors stand outside the Supreme Court of the United States with Trans flags and American flags waving above them.

LGBTQIA+ Equality

In February, the ACLU of Massachusetts filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s new policy that would deny accurate passports to transgender, nonbinary, and intersex Americans. After winning relief for our plaintiffs, we secured a class-wide injunction, ensuring that many people can still acquire accurate travel documents. This cruel policy is an attack on the fundamental right to privacy, dignity, and personal safety, and we will continue our fight for equality on appeal.

Two people smiling in beanie hats at Brockton BIPOC to theBallot Box.

Voting Rights

In 2025, we expanded our BIPOC the Ballot Box (B2BB) initiative from Brockton, Springfield, and Pittsfield to include Lawrence, Worcester, and the town of Randolph, building civic engagement in majority-minority communities. Led by our Racial Justice team, B2BB focuses on door knocking, candidate questionnaires, and youth education. Our goal: strengthening the right to vote for everyone. We also are pushing for same-day voter registration and other critical voting rights reforms.

Kade Crockford testifying before the Advanced IT Committee at the Massachusetts Statehouse

Privacy and Bodily Autonomy

The ACLU of Massachusetts Technology for Liberty Program continues to be a national leader in the fields of data privacy and mass surveillance. With rapidly developing new threats like unregulated artificial intelligence, the sale of sensitive personal data, and location tracking, ACLU advocacy — covering everything from Flock license-plate readers to cellphone location data to ShotSpotter microphones — is essential to ensure privacy, associational rights, access to reproductive health care, and bodily autonomy in the Commonwealth and nationwide.

Carol Rose speaking to the crowd at the No Kings Protest in Boston Common

Church and State Separation

In October, we secured a preliminary injunction blocking the installation of two ten-foot-tall religious statues outside the entrance of a government building in Quincy. In the meantime, our lawsuit, filed on behalf of a multifaith group of residents, will continue in state courts. We argue that the City’s plan to install these statues — without any public input — is a clear violation of our state constitution, which prohibits the government from favoring one religion over another.

Featured Cases

Court Case
Apr 02, 2025
Free Rumeysa Ozturk

Öztürk v. Trump

Court Case
Nov 05, 2024
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights

Guerrero Orellana v. Hyde et al

In September 2025, the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, together with the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, the ACLU of New Hampshire, the ACLU of Maine, the law firm Araujo and Fisher, the law firm Foley Hoag, and the Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinic, filed a class action lawsuit in federal court to challenge the widespread denial of bond hearings to people detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. As the complaint demonstrates, this denial upends decades of settled law and established practice in immigration proceedings. The complaint alleges that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice recently and abruptly began to misclassify people arrested by ICE inside the United States. DHS and DOJ started systematically reclassifying these people from the statutory authority of 8 U.S.C. § 1226, which usually allows for the opportunity to request bond during removal proceedings, to the no-bond detention provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1225, which does not apply to people arrested in the interior of the United States and placed in removal proceedings. This case is brought on behalf of Jose Arnulfo Guerrero Orellana and a putative class of similarly situated individuals. Mr. Guerrero Orellana has been living in the United States for over a decade. He brings this case to vindicate his own right to a bond hearing — where an immigration judge can determine whether his detention is justified to protect the community or ensure his appearance in court — and that of thousands of other detainees in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Maine, and New Hampshire who will be denied the opportunity to seek release on bond under the new legal ruling adopted by the executive branch. The complaint alleges that the government's new policy violates constitutional and statutory due process rights as well as the Administrative Procedure Act.
Court Case
Apr 30, 2025
courtroom-stock 144091
  • Free Speech and Expression|
  • +1 Issue

Schiff v. Office of Personnel Management

In March 2025, doctors from Harvard Medical School challenged the removal of their articles from the Patient Safety Network (PSNet), a government-run website for doctors and medical researchers to share information about medical errors, misdiagnoses, and patient outcomes.
Court Case
Aug 18, 2025
courtroom-stock 144091
  • Immigrants' Rights

Doe v. Moniz

In July 2025, the ACLU of Massachusetts, together with the ACLU, law firm Rubin Pomerleau, P.C., and Boston College Law School Immigration Clinic filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the detention of an 18-year-old under the Laken Riley Act (LRA). The habeas petition alleges “John Doe”...

Related Content

Resource

2024 Annual Report

Resource
Statue of Liberty

2025 Board Elections

Current ACLU of Massachusetts members who have paid their dues within the past 15 months are eligible to vote for the organization’s Board of Directors.
Resource
MA_State_House.jpg

2025-2026 Legislative Session

Across the country, fundamental freedoms are at stake: from abortion bans to the criminalization of trans people to mass deportation of our immigrant neighbors. Here in Massachusetts, our leaders can – and must – prioritize residents’ health, safety, and economic security...
Resource
Web_Feature_Double_d2.png

2025 Bill of Rights Gala: Choosing Community Over Chaos