ICE

Immigration detainees at Suffolk House of Corrections launch hunger strike

Detainees report conditions that mirror those identified by the ACLU five years ago in report "Detention and Deportation in the Age of ICE."

TRUST Act heads to state Judiciary Committee

Massachusetts bill seeks to limit impact of controversial "Secure Communities" deportation program.

En español: Audiencia para el Acta de Confianza en la Cámara Estatal de Massachusetts

27 organizations say no to expanding ICE presence in Massachusetts

Agreements with local officers would let county sheriffs enforce immigration laws.

"Show me your papers" comes to Massachusetts

Matt Segal

 
Matthew R. Segal, legal director of the ACLU of Massachusetts, originally wrote this guest blog for Boston.com.
 

Starting on May 15, the federal government will effectively force Massachusetts--that’s right, force--to participate in “Secure Communities,” an immigration dragnet that risks pushing Massachusetts toward an Arizona-style “show me your papers” regime.

This is bad news for all Massachusetts residents. S-Comm promotes racial profiling, jeopardizes public safety, and inhibits economic growth. Although the federal government seems intent on implementing this flawed program anyway, Massachusetts officials should try to limit the havoc that it wreaks.

Friday Night ICE


Laura Rotolo

Laura Rótolo, FOIA counsel and community advocate for the ACLU of Massachusetts, originally wrote this guest blog for Boston.com.

It’s Friday afternoon. Time for another hollow announcement by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) purporting to fix its controversial “Secure Communities” program. These announcements—exquisitely timed to avoid media attention—have become such a pattern that advocates have come to expect “Friday surprises.”

This time, ICE announced its response to the criticisms of a task force comprising a diverse group of stakeholders hand-picked by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The task force criticized Secure Communities (S-Comm) for its inconsistent messaging, lack of transparency, and interference with community policing.